20,000 years ago, much of North America was covered by an enormous ice sheet. Geoglyphs, burial mounds, and other structures thought to have been built by the indigenous people of North America can be found throughout the US and Canada. This article explores the possibility that some of these structures could have been built by an earlier prehistoric civilization that inhabited the southern US during the last ice age.

Clovis Second (or Third)?

The prevailing theory is that the first people of North America arrived by way of a land bridge from Asia at the end of the last ice age. Genetic analysis indicates that a group of people, known as the Clovis culture, based on the distinctive stone tools they used, were the ancestors of most of the native people of North and South America. Genetic analysis also reveals links to populations in other parts of the world that challenge the “Clovis First” hypothesis. One possibility is that an even earlier people known as the Solutreans migrated from southern Europe 21,000–15,000 years. Regardless of how they arrived, evidence in form of human footprints shows humans were living in the American Southwest 21,000 to 23,000 years ago during the last glacial maximum (LGM).

Archaeological Sites

Using Ancient Locations and other sources to identify candidate sites, the geographic orientations of almost two dozen structures were analyzed with respect to the equinox (E), solstices (S), major (M), and minor (m) lunar standstills.

Site/Structure	Arctic Pole	Hudson Bay Pole
Natchez		E
Ocmulgee	S
Rock Wall		E
Winterville	M
Blythe Intaglios (S)		S
Blythe Intaglios (NE)	E,S
Blythe Intaglios (NW)		E,S
Etowah		S
Wupatki	M
Nalakihu	M
Pueblo Pintado	m
Tusayan	M
Tsin Kletsin	E
Pueblo Bonito, Chaco Canyon	E
Chetro Ketl		S,m
Pueblo del Arroyo	m
Mound Bottom		E
Sun Temple, Mesa Verde		S
Cohokia	E
Great Serpent Mound	S
Aztalan	E

About 2/3 of the sites/structures are oriented in directions that reference the current (Arctic) pole.

The other 1/3 are not aligned in any of these directions but instead appear to reference a location near Hudson Bay that Charles Hapgood argued was the position of the geographic North Pole during the North American ice age.

South of the Ice Sheet

If the North Pole were in Hudson Bay, the southern US would have been in the northern temperate climate zone and ice-free during the LGM. Sites aligned to the current pole are found throughout the area while those aligned to the Hudson Bay pole are only found south of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, which is what one would expect if they were built during the LGM.

Although all of these sites are attributed to various Native cultures, like sites throughout the world believed to have been established within the past few thousand years, the alignment of sites to the Hudson Bay pole raises the possibility they could be much older, perhaps built over more ancient structures.

Rock Wall

Approximately 20 miles northeast of Dallas is the town of Rockwall, Texas. Soon after the first settlers arrived in the 1840s, a rock wall was discovered on a farm owned by Terry Utley Wade. Later another rock wall to the northeast was encountered while digging a well. A square opening resembling a window was found at a depth of 35 feet. In 1933, a map prepared with the help of the county surveyor showed the location of numerous rock outcrops.

Geological investigations found the outcrops to be clastic sandstone dikes – natural structures associated with geological faults that resemble stone masonry. Comparing this map with another compiled by John Lindsey, a native Rockwall architect, who led a reinvestigation of the reported features, including an excavation in the 1990s, independent investigator Josh Reeves determined that the sections of the rock wall analyzed by geologists and found to be natural were not part of the structure mapped by Lindsey.

In an independent analysis of the geology of the rock wall motivated by Lindsey’s investigation, James J. (Bud) Shelton, a petroleum geologist, found “the current geological explanation, that of a clastic sandstone dike sourced by the Upper Cretaceous Trinity Group Lower Wolf City sandstone member does not adequately explain the presence of the feature” citing “seemingly out of place and context stone, possible mortar and plaster-like materials related to distinguishable architectural-like features” specifically “staggered joint stone masonry features” and “linteled portals and archways complete with arch guiding springer stones.” Also in Shelton’s report was the presence of large cavities in the rock wall complex, which corroborates descriptions of reported underground spaces mentioned by Reeves in his video.

Although none of the rock wall is currently visible from the air, it is possible to register Lindsey’s map to Google Earth using roads and other cultural features. As shown in the above figure, the lower left section of the rock wall complex appears to be oriented in the direction of the Hudson Bay pole. Our discovery of other sites in the southern US that reference the Hudson Bay pole suggests the orientation of the rock wall in this same direction may not be a coincidence and that the largest antediluvian structure in North America may be beneath the suburbs just outside Dallas.

---

Image at the top of the article courtesy Google Earth/ Zürich University of Applied Sciences.

If we were to examine the orientation of ancient places across the world, what fraction would be aligned to the sun, moon, stars, or in other known ways? This question was first posed in a paper published by the Journal of Scientific Exploration in 2018. The key finding of a worldwide survey of ancient sites was that only about 40% of the over 200 sites examined appeared to be aligned in known astronomical or geographical directions. Over the past six years, hundreds of additional sites have been analyzed. This article, which is based on a presentation at the Altars of the Sun and Moon conference organized to coincide with the recent April 2024 total eclipse by the New England Antiquities Research Association (NEARA), updates the original survey by providing compelling statistical evidence supporting the hypothesis that hundreds of sites worldwide are probably far older than we think.

Determining the Alignment of a Site

In order to determine if a site is aligned to something we must first measure its orientation with respect to true (geographic) north. One way to do this is on the ground with a compass using a declination table to correct for differences between true and geomagnetic north. A far more accurate and efficient way is with overhead (satellite) imagery (provided the site is visible from above). At first, I used the ruler tool in Google Earth to measure the heading (clockwise angle from true north) of linear features and rectilinear structures having well-defined edges. I then compared the angles with solstice sunrise/sunset and other directions to determine if the site was aligned in a particular way. Later, to automate the process so that more sites could be examined, I developed an app known as Sacred Directions. By simply entering the latitude and longitude of a site, the app plots lines in the cardinal directions, directions of solstices, lunar standstills, and zenith passages, geomagnetic alignments, and directions to other sites over high-resolution satellite imagery. With the help of Sacred Directions, I have examined thousands of sites over the past six years.

Let’s first examine some sites that are aligned to the sun and the moon. Many places are oriented to face in the cardinal directions – north, south, east, and west. A previous article discussed the precise alignment of 3rd and 4th Dynasty Egyptian pyramids to the cardinal directions and how it is likely the ancient Egyptians aligned these structures on the equinox when the sun rises and sets due east-west.

Solstice alignments mark the longest and shortest days of the year. The alignment to the summer solstice sunrise at Stonehenge in England is well known. A passage tomb at Newgrange in Ireland, the Temple of Karnak in Upper Egypt, and the Ales Stones in Sweden are places that are oriented in the direction of the winter solstice sunrise.

Where solstice alignments mark the most northern and southern risings and settings of the sun over the course of a year (longest and shortest days in the northern hemisphere), lunar standstills do the same for the moon over its 18.6-year cycle. Examples of sites aligned to the moon include structures at Chaco Canyon in New Mexico, Palatine Hill in Rome, and the Ziggurat of Ur in Iraq.

Some ancient sites within the zone of the tropics are aligned in the direction of zenith passage sunrises/sunsets – days in which the sun passes directly overhead. A temple at Koh Ker in Cambodia is one such place.

Besides marking the motion of the sun and moon, a study of ancient sites reveals other reasons for their alignment. For example, numerous earthen pyramids in China appear to have been aligned in the direction of the geomagnetic pole at the time they were constructed. Certain sites are thought to have been oriented in the direction of specific stars such as the Temple of Hathor at Dendera in Egypt to Alkaid in Ursa Major. There are also sites that face in directions of importance such as Islamic qibla, Greek oracles, and Quechua ceque. We even found over a dozen sites in northwestern Europe that appear to face in the direction of Paris.

What We Discovered

The initial 2018 survey found 19% of the sites were aligned to the cardinal directions, 9% to solstices, 15% to lunar standstill, 5% to the geomagnetic pole at the time of construction, 5% to other sites, 4% to zenith passages, and 1% to stars, leaving 42% unexplained. In expanding the study to almost 900 sites, 19% of the sites were cardinally aligned, 7% oriented in solstice directions, 11% to lunar standstills, and 6% (mostly in China) to geomagnetic north. To our surprise, more sites appear to be aligned to lunar standstills than to solstices. In fact, broken out by geographical region, alignments to the moon occurred more frequently than those to the sun in 6 of the 15 regions considered (see table below). The most surprising result was that the orientation of about 70% of the sites could not be explained in terms of any of the alignments discussed above.

Region	Equinox	Solstice	Lunar Standstill	Sun	Moon	Unexplained
Arabia	0	1	3		X	5
Central Asia	2	3	2	X		26
China	0	2	6		X	16
Egypt	85	10	15	X		70
Greece	6	2	12		X	51
India	8	2	0	X		20
Italy	0	2	4		X	14
Levant	6	1	10		X	47
Mesoamerica	9	7	11	X		63
Mesopotamia	22	5	4	X		47
N. Africa	0	2	4		X	32
N. America	4	1	5			11
S. America	0	6	4	X		58
Torgai	1	3	0	X		4
N. Europe	0	3	1	X		10

Evidence of Civilizations Before Our Own?

That so many sites could not be explained by current models was an unexpected finding – an anomaly. According Thomas Kuhn in The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, the discovery of “anomalies” during revolutions in science leads to new paradigms. New paradigms then ask new questions of old data, move beyond the mere “puzzle-solving” of the previous paradigm, change the rules of the game and the “map” directing new research. In analyzing the orientations of unexplained sites, we found that most appear to reference four locations within about 30 degrees of the current geographic pole. If these were previous locations of the North Pole, Hapgood’s theory of earth crustal displacement offers a simple explanation and an interesting alternative to current theories regarding the age of these sites.

According to our revised and expanded version of Hapgood’s theory, sites aligned to a North Pole in Hudson Bay could be 20-50 thousand years old – places like Teotihuacan, north of Mexico City, which is cardinally aligned to the pole, the Osirion in Upper Egypt aligned to the summer solstice sunrise, and the Pantheon in Rome aligned to major lunar standstills relative to the Hudson Bay pole.

According to Hapgood’s theory, before Hudson Bay, the geographic pole is hypothesized to have been located in the Norwegian Sea 50-75 thousand years ago. Three sites that reference a North Pole in the Norwegian Sea include Chichen Itza in Mexico, Por-Bazhyn in Siberia, and one of the more prominent Nazca lines in Peru.

Between 75 and 130 thousand years ago, climate data suggest the North Pole was in northern Greenland, not far from where it is today. The Parthenon atop the Acropolis in Athens, Baalbek in Lebanon, and the western and southern walls surrounding the Temple Mount in Jerusalem are all cardinally aligned with respect to the Greenland pole.

The oldest pole is thought to have been located in the Bering Sea more than 130 thousand years ago. The most prominent of the Nazca lines points to the Bering Sea pole as do a number of ancient sites in Peru’s Sacred Valley including the Temple of the Sun at Ollantaytambo. Lion’s Rock and the surrounding complex at Sigiriya are aligned to the winter solstice sunrise relative to the Bering Sea pole.

These are just a few of the previously unexplained sites whose orientations can be explained by changing the frame of reference. Perhaps the best evidence in support of Hapgood’s theory is the sheer number of sites we have found that can be explained in this way.

Region	Ar	HB	NS	Gr	BS	X	E	S	M
Greece	26	17	8	12	14	6	32	13	21
N. Europe	7	10	0	0	0	0	6	7	7
Mesoamerica	33	37	14	10	2	2	62	11	16
Egypt	111	20	8	34	8	0	107	32	38
Pacific	0	4	0	0	0	0	1	3	0
Mesopotamia	33	20	4	10	13	0	41	20	13
Torgai	4	2	1	1	0	0	5	3	0
Central Asia	7	13	3	7	3	0	15	15	3
India	11	14	1	4	1	0	22	8	2
Arabia	4	3	0	1	1	0	3	2	5
Levant	19	14	8	18	7	0	35	10	21
China	50	10	1	4	1	42	6	4	10
Italy	6	12	2	0	0	0	3	7	12
N. Africa	10	24	6	2	0	0	9	14	22
N. America	11	11	0	0	0	0	10	8	8
S. America	12	11	11	12	24	0	16	23	19
Easter Is.	0	0	0	4	7	0	3	3	5
TOTALS	344	222	67	119	81	50	376	183	202

The last chapter in Beyond Atlantis examines the statistical significance of these numbers and several interesting patterns discovered in the data. As shown in the table below, the probability that a group of sites randomly faces a particular location decreases exponentially as the number of sites increases. The alignment of 344 sites to the Arctic pole is clearly not a coincidence. The probability that this could have occurred by chance is zero. Similarly, the probability of 222 sites randomly lining up to the Hudson Bay pole is practically zero. Statistically, this too cannot be a coincidence. Although the other probabilities appear at first to be less significant, it is plausible that there are fewer sites aligned to older poles because older sites had less of a chance of surviving the ravages of time and were more likely to have been destroyed or buried.

Pole	Number of Sites	Probability of Random Alignment
Arctic	344	0
Hudson Bay	222	1.87 x 10-42
Norwegian Sea	67	0.0077
Greenland	119	0.00002
Bering Sea	81	0.045

Critics insist there is no need of a new theory as unexplained sites might not have have been purposefully aligned or were aligned in other unknown ways. That “unexplained” sites are found in all parts of the world implies the anomaly is both global in scope and systematic in nature and not due to a lack of knowledge regarding local factors, cultural context, etc. The idea that unexplained sites were not purposefully aligned to anything is not consistent with our finding similarly aligned structures in most regions.

Although it may be difficult to prove Hapgood’s theory of earth crustal displacement, the power of a good theory is in its ability to explain a lot and to do so in a simple way. Hapgood’s theory provides a simple way to explain the climate changes associated with ice ages as well as the alignment of hundreds of ancient sites that cannot otherwise be explained.

In the words of Arthur Conan Doyle, “When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”

Richard Cassaro first brought the amazing cyclopean walls in Spain to my attention several years ago. Many sites in the Mediterranean are either cardinally aligned N-S-E-W or in directions of solstices and lunar standstills. But almost as many are in directions that are not explainable in conventional terms. As I was expanding my search for other sites that supported the Before Atlantis hypothesis, I discovered numerous sites that appeared to reference previous pole locations. 

A recent video by Hugh Newman had a very interesting shot from out of one of the gates leading into the old walls of Tarragona, a city on the east coast of Spain. It showed a compass reading that was a few degrees west of due north. 

The largest structures on earth tend to be the most precisely aligned. For example, the Giza pyramids, as well as the oldest (and deepest) foundations at Teotihuacan, Chichen Itza, Baalbek, and Machu Picchu, were all precisely aligned to the cardinal direction at the time of construction, according to the Before Atlantis hypothesis. The Giza pyramids being the most recent were aligned to the current pole, Teotihuacan to the previous pole estimated to have been located in Hudson Bay 20,000 to 50,000 years ago, Chichen Itza to the Norwegian Sea pole 50,000 to 75,000 years ago, Baalbek to the Greenland pole 75,000 to 130,000 years ago, and Machu Picchu to the Bering Sea pole, at least 130,000 years ago.

So why would Tarragona be a few degrees off from due north? It turns out that if the North Pole were in the Norwegian Sea, the pole would be several degrees west of its current location and the view from that gate at Tarragona would have faced exactly due north. Coincidence? 

The main thoroughfare, Rambla Nova, is oriented in a direction that is closely aligned to the winter solstice sunrise and summer solstice sunset. The alignment would have been exact around 300 BCE. Changes in the earth’s axial tilt causes the direction of the solstices to change over a 41,000-year cycle. Based on the timing of the cycle another exact alignment also existed in 13,000 BCE.

Three other streets emanate like the spokes of a wheel radially from Font del Centenari at the center of the city. All three appear to be oriented in solar and lunar directions relative to the Norwegian Sea pole – C. de Pete Martell and Av. de Prat de la Riba to major lunar standstills circa 63,000 BCE and Av. Marques de Montoliu to the summer solstice sunrise and winter solstice sunset 52,700 BCE.

Is it possible that the oldest foundations at Tarragona were built when the North Pole was only 2,000 miles away in the Norwegian Sea? At that distance, Tarragona would have been in the northern temperate zone at roughly the latitude as Anchorage, Alaska. It is interesting that there do not appear to be similar constructions in northern Europe, only in the Mediterranean region. Why?

Hapgood’s pole shift hypothesis provides a plausible explanation. At the northern extreme of the temperate zone, places further north would be in the polar zone and not suitable for human habitation. That the earth’s poles have shifted several times over the past 100,000 years provides not only a simple and compelling explanation for ice ages and glacial cycles but also explains the alignment of hundreds of archaeological sites across the world that otherwise have no conventional explanation. Although it has and continues to be dismissed by the geological community, that so much climate and archaeological evidence appears to support his hypothesis makes it hard to ignore.

Feature image at the top of the article courtesy Tomàs./Flickr/Creative Commons

The Richat Structure also known as the “eye” of the Sahara in Mauritania is a deeply eroded geological structure of exposed layers of sedimentary rock that appear as concentric rings. Because of its shape, some believe it to be the remains of Plato’s Atlantis. Scott Sanem contacted me about a similar structure in Paredon located in northeastern Mexico that he has seen many times from the air. 

Elephant Remains in Mexico

Wondering if this feature like the Richat Structure could be evidence of a previous civilization in this part of the world, Scott discovered an interesting article in the November and December 1903 issue of The American Antiquarian. The article entitled “Elephant Remains in Mexico” begins with the following introduction:

From the City of Mexico comes a statement bearing the signature of Dr. Nicholas Leon, archaeologist of the National Museum of Mexico. The signature would justify the belief that proper investigation of the facts related has been made. The one great fact is that an ancient city, which was located near the present town of Paredon, in the state of Coahuila, some 500 miles north of the City of Mexico, was suddenly destroyed in some past age by an overflow of water and mud, and that its remains are still existent on the spot. Many massive walls have been found, but they are covered with a mass of deposited earth, sixty feet in thickness. And mingled in this earth are human skeletons, the tusks of elephants, etc., distributed in a way which indicates that the overflow of water and mud was sudden, giving no time for escape.

Dr. Leon, who was one of the most respected archaeologists in Mexico at this time, joined the National Museum in Mexico City in 1900 and became head of the Department of Anthropology. The article continues:

The account which has fallen under our notice is somewhat brief. We cannot vouch for its accuracy, and simply present the report:

Portions of buildings, so far unearthed, show that the city — at least the largest of the cities were covered by the debris of the flood, there being at least three cities destroyed— was very extensive. The indications are that there were many massive structures in the fallen city, and that they were of a class of architecture not to be found elsewhere in Mexico. According to the estimates of the scientists under whose directions the excavations are now being made, the city in question had a population of at least 50,000.

The destruction which was brought by the flood was complete. All the inhabitants of the cities were killed, as well as all the animals. Skeletons of the human inhabitants of the cities and of the animals are strewn all through the debris, from a depth of three feet from the surface to a depth of sixty feet, showing that all the debris was deposited almost at once. Measurements show that the debris is on an average, sixty feet-deep where the largest of the cities stood.

Most remarkable of the minor finds that have been made at Paredon is that of the remains of elephants. Never before in the history of Mexico has it been ascertained positively that elephants were ever in the service of the ancient inhabitants. The remains of the elephants that have been found at Paredon show plainly that the inhabitants of the buried cities made elephants work for them. Elephants were as much in evidence in the cities as horses. Upon many of the tusks that have been found were rings of silver. Most of the tusks encountered so far have an average length, for grown elephants, of three feet, and an average diameter at the roots of six inches. Judging from the remains of the elephants so far unearthed, the animals were about ten feet in height and sixteen to eighteen feet in length, differing very little from those at present in existence.

Several editorial comments follow that leave with reader with some doubt about the credibility of Dr. Leon’s report:

Now, these statements in reference to the elephants’ bones found among the ruined cities need confirmation, before they are accepted by the majority of archaeologists. It is true that the tusks and bones of mastodons are frequently found in the swamps of Michigan, Ohio, and Indiana, but they are supposed to belong to the same species which are found in the frozen mud of Siberia and the gravels of the Northwest coast. A species covered with hair and adapted to the cold climate, and quite different from any-that would be found as far south as Mexico. The circumpolar regions are full of these creatures, which have perished, but their bodies have been preserved in the ice-beds. Other animals, such as the buffalo and bison, have over run portions of this continent, since the days of the mastodon, but none of them reached as far south as Mexico.

An Ice Age Civilization in Northeastern Mexico?

The discovery of hundreds of mammoth skeletons recovered at an airport construction site north of Mexico City in 2020 suggests the bones unearthed by Dr. Leon were not those of elephants but of mammoths. As we saw in the previous article, if we accept the possibility of crustal displacements as a working hypothesis, according to Hapgood’s theory, if the North Pole were in Hudson Bay during the North American ice age, most of the places mammoth remains have been found would have been in the temperate zone relative to the former pole. That region, which is known as the Mammoth Steppe stretches from the Iberian Peninsula in western Europe, across Eurasia, through Beringia, and into North America. The discovery of mammoth remains near Mexico City suggests this region extended into Northern Mexico. 

The bones found at “Mammoth Central” near Mexico City are estimated to be 10,000 to 20,000 years old. If the elephant remains found by Dr. Leon were those of mammoths, then this portion of his report becomes extremely interesting:

The one great fact is that an ancient city, which was located near the present town of Paredon, in the state of Coahuila, some 500 miles north of the City of Mexico, was suddenly destroyed in some past age by an overflow of water and mud, and that its remains are still existent on the spot. Many massive walls have been found, but they are covered with a mass of deposited earth, sixty feet in thickness. And mingled in this earth are human skeletons, the tusks of elephants, etc., distributed in a way which indicates that the overflow of water and mud was sudden, giving no time for escape.

Geological Evidence of a Crustal Displacement?

The Richat Structure is thought to be a kind of symmetrical uplift feature known as a dome, probably volcanic in origin. Where the Richat Structure is an isolated formation in the Sahara, the “eye” of Mexico, exists along with other similar features in a region that lies between the mountains to the west and the coastal plain to the east. 

Although it is not itself an impact feature, domes can sometimes be found near impact craters. Besides volcanism, domes can also form as the result of a process known as diapirism in which less dense materials rise to the surface, and from horizontal stresses resulting in the formation of a system of basins and domes, a process known as refolding.

If a crustal displacement shifted the North Pole from Hudson Bay to the Arctic, the line of maximum displacement would have been only about 1400 miles to the east. Could horizontal stresses caused by a crustal displacement have been responsible for the unusual landscape around Paredon?

Conclusion

Evidently, Dr. Leon never published a detailed account of his findings in a scientific paper:

The cities of Mexico are supposed to have been built not earlier than 1500 A. D.—about 500 years ago. If any were built earlier, they are in ruins, but no remains of elephants have been discovered among the ruins, in fact no semblance of the elephant has been recognized in the sculpture, except in a few cases, where what resembles an elephant’s trunk, or the trunk of a tapir, is found on the sculptured columns at Copan. The discovery of elephant bones would bo too important a matter to be ignored, but the article seems sensational and has been sent to the newspapers as a sensational item, and not to the scientific societies, so far as we have learned.

One has to wonder if Dr. Leon’s field notes still exist in some form, in some place, say in the basement of the National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH) in Mexico City, and if so, do they provide sufficient detail to tell us where his finds are located? In the same way ancient sites discovered in Turkey dated to 10,000 BCE or more replaced what had been the most ancient sites in Mesopotamia, could there be ruins in Mexico that are even older, perhaps thousands of years older than even the Younger Dryas, dating to the end of a previous age, to the end of the last ice age?

During the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), the Mammoth Steppe was a vast region that stretched from the Iberian Peninsula in western Europe, across Eurasia, through Beringia, and into North America. Besides the woolly mammoth, reindeer, muskox, antelope, bison, horses, and the woolly rhinoceros lived there during the North American ice age. Now extinct, the mammoth, which weighed up to nine tons, is estimated to have required about four hundred pounds of food each day to survive. With numerous mammoth remains found in Siberia above the Arctic Circle, it is a mystery how an animal the size of an elephant was able to find that much food in such a barren place. 

Explaining the Thickest Ice on Earth

As Earth warms, sea levels rise as ice at the poles melts. Similarly, as Earth cools, sea levels fall as glaciers form at the poles. 

In the north polar region, the thickest ice is in the mountainous interior of Greenland, about 1200 miles from the North Pole. In Antarctica, the thickest ice is not at its center at the South Pole but almost 1000 miles away in the high plateau of Eastern Antarctica. 

In the case of Greenland, the ice sheet has been accumulating for over 110,000 years, with some of the oldest ice found dating back over 800,000 years.  But why is the ice in Greenland just as thick in Antarctica, and why it is located where it is and not at the poles?

Hapgood’s Theory of Crustal Displacement

Hapgood’s theory, which is the starting point of our research in Before Atlantis, provides a simple and compelling explanation for why the thickest ice is where it is. In a previous article, we showed that the regions of thickest ice are the regions that have remained in the polar regions during the last four crustal displacements. 

All of the northern polar zone (regions above the Arctic Circle) were covered in ice during the LGM except for Siberia. Why?

According to Hapgood’s theory of crustal displacement, ice ages and inter-glacial periods are not caused by the Earth as a whole becoming significantly colder and then warmer but by different regions shifting into and out of the polar regions. If according to Hapgood’s data, now corroborated by Mark Gaffney, the North Pole were in Hudson Bay, not only would North America have been frozen under a continental ice sheet but Siberia and the whole Mammoth Steppe would have been in the temperate zone.

If a crustal displacement approximately 20,000 years ago shifted the North Pole from Hudson Bay to the Arctic Ocean, it would have changed Siberia from a temperate climate where mammoths and other animals that inhabited the steppe would have found more than enough food to the cold barren landscape we see today. Although the evidence is anecdotal, stories about the remains of plants that grow in temperate climates in the guts of frozen mammoth remains, support this hypothesis.

Feature image at the top of the article “Mammoth Steppe” generated by DeepAI’s Fantasy World Generator.

This article presents the first verifiable space-based evidence of an enormous underground structure at Hawara that is likely the below-ground portion of the Labyrinth first mentioned by Herodotus. Combining historical sources with modern geospatial data reveals a discrepancy between Herodotus’s account of colossal stone structures in the middle of Lake Moeris and Petrie’s archaeological survey of much more modest ruins at Biahmu. An analysis of the alignment of the Labyrinth and other ancient sites in the Faiyum suggests they may be much older than we think.

Click here to read the full paper.

Click here for a more detailed paper about the Labyrinth.

The Labyrinth

The legendary Labyrinth of Hawara was brought to the attention of the Western world by Herodotus in the fifth century BC. He describes an above-ground structure that he saw, and one below-ground that he was denied access to by the Egyptians.

Moreover, they decided to preserve the memory of their names by a common memorial, and so they made a labyrinth a little way beyond lake Moeris and near the place called the City of Crocodiles. I have seen it myself, and indeed words cannot describe it; if one were to collect the walls and evidence of other efforts of the Greeks, the sum would not amount to the labor and cost of this labyrinth. And yet the temple at Ephesus and the one on Samos are noteworthy. Though the pyramids beggar description and each one of them is a match for many great monuments built by Greeks, this maze surpasses even the pyramids. It has twelve roofed courts with doors facing each other: six face north and six south, in two continuous lines, all within one outer wall. There are also double sets of chambers, three thousand altogether, fifteen hundred above and the same number under ground. We ourselves viewed those that are above ground, and speak of what we have seen, but we learned through conversation about the underground chambers; the Egyptian caretakers would by no means show them, as they were, they said, the burial vaults of the kings who first built this labyrinth, and of the sacred crocodiles. Thus we can only speak from hearsay of the lower chambers; the upper we saw for ourselves, and they are creations greater than human. The exits of the chambers and the mazy passages hither and thither through the courts were an unending marvel to us as we passed from court to apartment and from apartment to colonnade, from colonnades again to more chambers and then into yet more courts. Over all this is a roof, made of stone like the walls, and the walls are covered with cut figures, and every court is set around with pillars of white stone very precisely fitted together. Near the corner where the labyrinth ends stands a pyramid two hundred and forty feet high, on which great figures are cut. A passage to this has been made underground.

Sir Flinders Petrie’s 19th-century survey provides a rough idea of the scale of the above-ground structure. His assessment was that the Labyrinth was maintained up to the second century BCE – “at least as late as Kleopatra I, 193 B.C., the Labyrinth was still in royal care, and probably being restored in some degree. Soon after that, ruin fell upon it, and in Pliny’s time it was ‘marvellously ravaged.’” Petrie’s reconstruction of the western half of the Labyrinth indicates a north-south length of approximately 526 feet. Squaring that (assuming the structure is roughly square) yields an area of about 277,000 square feet.

Mataha Expedition

In 2008, the Mataha expedition reported the discovery of below-ground features resembling archaeological structures south of the Hawara pyramid of Amenemhet III:

These features covering an underground area of several hectares, have the prominent signature of vertical walls on the geophysical results. The vertical walls with an average thickness of several meters, are connected to shape nearly closed rooms, which are interpreted to be huge in number.

Very low frequency electromagnetic (VLF-EM) surveys revealed “spatially distributed elongated and square shaped subsurface anomalies, which may identify the walls and rooms of the labyrinth mortuary temple complex.”

The presence of possible archeological features below ground suggests the possibility that what Petrie thought was the foundation of a large above-ground structure could instead be the roof of an undiscovered structure below ground. As the VLF-EM and other surveys were conducted over a limited area, it was not possible to determine the full extent of the underground structure.

Inspired by the discoveries of the Mataha expedition, a remarkable 3D reconstruction of the site using proprietary space-based technology revealed two levels of subterranean chambers over an extended area surrounding the pyramid of Amenemhat III. But unlike the Mataha findings, no accompanying scientific paper describing either the methodology or the data used was ever published making it difficult to corroborate their findings.

Spaceborne Radar Imaging

Under certain conditions, spaceborne synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is able to penetrate desert sands to reveal subsurface features. Sentinel-1, the first of the five missions developed by the European Space Agency under the Copernicus initiative, transmits vertically polarized waves and receives horizontally and vertically polarized waves that are processed to form VH and VV images. VV images tend to pick up height/vertical features whereas VH images tend to be more sensitive to surface textures. A portion of a C-band Sentinel-1 SAR image collected 7/6/2023 over a region in Western Egypt containing the Faiyum Oasis centered on the pyramid of Amenemhet III in Hawara is shown below.

Although there are a number of strong returns in its vicinity, the lack of a strong response from the pyramid itself is likely due to its highly eroded state. Several bright returns north of the pyramid (A) are from high-voltage transmission line towers (you can see one of the towers in the feature image at the top of the article). Below the pyramid in what is believed to be a mortuary complex are at least three returns that are rectangular in shape.

One of the delineated regions (B) is about 275,000 sq. feet – almost the same size as the rectangular area excavated by Petrie. Another region (C) may be the continuation of the above structure. A second rectangular area (D) west of the Faiyum canal is also evident in the SAR image. The lack of any structures in Google Earth imagery over these areas indicates that they are subsurface features. It is interesting that the orientation of these structures is not the same as the pyramid of Amenemhet III suggesting they are not part of the mortuary complex.

The Pedestals of Biahmu

Herodotus goes on to describe what he saw north of the Labyrinth:

Such is this labyrinth; and still more marvellous is lake Moeris, on which it stands. This lake has a circumference of four hundred and fifty miles, or sixty schoeni: as much as the whole seaboard of Egypt. Its length is from north to south; the deepest part has a depth of fifty fathoms. That it has been dug out and made by men’s hands the lake shows for itself; for almost in the middle of it stand two pyramids, so built that fifty fathoms of each are below and fifty above the water; atop each is a colossal stone figure seated on a throne. Thus these pyramids are a hundred fathoms high; and a hundred fathoms equal a furlong of six hundred feet, the fathom measuring six feet or four cubits, the foot four spans and the cubit six spans. The water of the lake is not natural (for the country here is exceedingly arid) but brought by a channel from the Nile; six months it flows into the lake, and six back into the river. For the six months that it flows out of the lake, the daily take of fish brings a silver talent into the royal treasury, and twenty minae for each day of the flow into the lake. 

When Petrie visited the ruins at Biahmu, he found the remains of two stone structures. Based on his reconstruction, stone figures, about forty feet tall, were emplaced on platforms about 30 feet high, for a total height of about 70 feet. This is only ¼ of the above water height reported by Herodotus, who coincidentally overestimated the circumference (perimeter) of the lake by a factor of four as well.

Lacking modern technology Herodotus cannot be faulted by the inaccuracy of his measurements. But there seems to be more to the discrepancy. In fact, Petrie’s description of Biahmu does not seem to match Herodotus’s at all:

When, six years ago, I visited the two so-called pyramids of Biahmu, about four miles north of Medinet el Fayum, I concluded from their appearance that it was very unlikely that they had really been pyramids, but rather that they were courts surrounding two great pedestals on which statues had stood. This result agreed nearly with the description of Herodotos, of two pyramids rising out of the water, each bearing a stone statue seated on a throne. His idea that they were large pyramids half submerged was easily to be explained by the fact of his visiting the province during the inundation, and his viewing them from Arsinoe, and not going down to Biahmu. The Arab name, Kursi Faraun, or “throne of Pharaoh,” accords also with this idea ; they are, however, more usually known as es sanatn, the “high places” or “high things.”

Where was Herodotus when he saw the Colossi? The water level of Lake Moeris (see below) has varied considerably (up to 60 meters) over the last 10,000 years. Using a digital elevation model (DEM), we can estimate the water level when Amenemhet III is thought to have built the Colossi and when Herodotus saw them. Based on the DEM, Biahmu was above water at the time of Amenemhet III and below water when Herodotus was there. But more importantly, if the Colossi were partially below water, so too was the surrounding area over a radius of more than six miles. From this distance, the pyramids in Giza are barely visible let alone a structure the size reconstructed by Petrie. If the stonework that Petrie believed was a courtyard around the figures was the base of a pyramid 120 feet tall, even that would not be large enough to be visible from that distance.

Another possibility is that Herodotus was in a boat. But if he were, one would think he would have sailed up to Colossi to see them close up. After all, he did attempt (unsuccessfully) to visit the Labyrinth’s underground.

If Herodotus was right about the Labyrinth, perhaps he was right about the Colossi as well.

A way of reconciling Herodotus’s account and Petrie’s reconstruction is to hypothesize that the structure Amenemhet III built, or possibly co-opted was once much larger. Like the Labyrinth, perhaps the original structure at Biahmu was dismantled and used as building material leaving only the modest reminder we see today.

Discussion

Qasr al Sagha is a megalithic structure north of Lake Moeris. Seemingly in the middle of nowhere, Qasr al Sagha would have been close to the lake shoreline when the water level was higher. The same is true of another site, Dimai (Soknopaiou Nesos), which is also north of Lake Moeris. It is believed that Lake Moeris existed as a paleolake more than 10,000 years ago. Although there have been variations in lake level even before the Faiyum canal, it has decreased significantly in size over the past 2500 years.

Devoid of any inscription, little is known about Qasr al Sagha. Composed of giant limestone blocks, its architectural style indicates Middle to Old Kingdom. That it is oriented in the direction of minor lunar standstills, not uncommon in desert regions, suggests Qasr al Sagha could have been a lunar temple.

Other sites in the Faiyum are more difficult to explain in terms of their alignment. Madinet Madi (“City of the Past”) is not aligned in known geographical/astronomical directions, however, its minor axis would have aligned with minor lunar standstills relative to the Hudson Bay pole – the hypothesized location of the North Pole during the North American ice age, 20,000 to 45,000 years ago. The alignment of its major axis would have been in the direction of the Greenland Pole, another proposed location of the North Pole even further back in time, 75,000 to 130,000 years ago. Subsurface features at Hawara, which are not aligned with the pyramid of Amenemhet III, are also oriented in the direction of the Greenland pole. Based on an application of Hapgood’s theory of crustal displacement theory, these alignments may be the fingerprint of at least two prehistoric civilizations in the Faiyum over the past 100,000 years or so.

---

Feature image at the top of the article courtesy Explore Faiyum .

In 1674, a Catholic priest, Francisco de Burgoa reported the discovery of a subterranean labyrinth under the ruins of Mitla. Immense stone chambers were said to extend many miles underground. 

In 2022, a joint research expedition by the Mexican National Institute of History and Anthropology (INAH), the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) and the Association for Archaeological Research and Exploration (ARX) uncovered evidence of a large void under the Catholic Church. Electrical resistivity tomography revealed the void is connected to underground chambers extending west, north, and east of the church.

Site Alignment

Numerous places in Mesoamerica contain structures aligned in a direction roughly 17 degrees east of north – places such as Teotihuacan, Tenayuca, Xochicalco, Ekbalam, Altun Ha, Copan, Tikal, Uxmal, and Mitla.

No single compelling reason for their alignment exists within the mainstream archaeological community. In Before Atlantis, we propose that these sites were first established during the last ice age when, according to Charles Hapgood in his theory of earth crustal displacement, the North Pole was in Hudson Bay and Mexico would have had a temperate climate. It is our contention that what archaeologists have discovered about the more recent pre-Columbian people that lived there is but one chapter of a much more ancient history.

Overlaying current geometrical and astronomical alignments on a Google Earth image of the Church Group of structures at Mitla shows the site is not aligned to the cardinal directions (N-S-E-W), or to the sun (solstices) or moon (lunar standstills). 

Displaying alignments relative to the Hudson Bay pole suggests the possibility that if the site was first established when the North Pole was in Hudson Bay the original structures would have been cardinally aligned N-S-E-W relative to the former pole.

Structures in the Columns Group would have been similarly aligned.

What makes this hypothesis compelling not only for Mitla but also for the other sites mentioned above is that it explains the alignment of all of them in a simple way.

In the next few months, the independently-funded joint research expedition hopes to continue its investigation of Mitla’s underground spaces. Click here and support one of the most important archeological discoveries in decades.

The image at the top of the article is courtesy Thayne Tuason/Creative Commons.

In Before Atlantis, we set out to explore the idea that shifts in the location of the North and South Poles were responsible for the misalignment of hundreds of ancient sites across the world. In the process, we have discovered (or rather rediscovered) how displacements of Earth’s crust – the reason the poles move – could also explain glacial cycles. In a recent paper, we described how changes at the North Pole predicted by pole shifts are correlated with the rise and fall of global sea levels over the past 130,000 years. In this article, we show that what was happening at the South Pole over this period also supports the crustal displacement theory.

Changes in the Northern Polar Zone

Charles Hapgood first hypothesized that glacial cycles were the result of climate changes caused by slippages of the Earth’s crust – that ice ages were not caused by global temperature fluctuations but were the direct result of different geographic regions moving in and out of the polar zone. 

We showed in a previous article that the extent of the northern ice sheet at the time of the last glacial maximum (LGM) was consistent with the accumulation of ice over a gradually increasing landmass that had been shifted into the northern polar region by a series of crustal displacements as illustrated below.

As shown below, the union of these regions is a pretty good approximation of the extent of the ice sheet at the LGM.

What is interesting is that if we take the intersection of these circles – the current and past northern polar zones (from about 66° N) over the past 130,000 years, the area highlighted in the following figure has remained in the polar zone continuing to accumulate snow and ice over this period.

It turns out that the thickest ice in the current northern polar zone, in Greenland, is in this region.

Antarctica

Performing a similar analysis at the South Pole, the largest area in Antarctica having the thickest ice has also been in the polar zone for the past 130,000 years.

Aside from central Greenland, most of the landmass in and around the North Pole is relatively flat. According to our theory, when landmasses move into the polar zone, they begin to accumulate snow and ice. When they move out of the polar zone, the ice melts. The situation in the Antarctic is different because of its elevation. Glaciers exist in the Alps, Himalayas, Andes, and other mountainous areas in the world that are more than two to three thousand meters in elevation. About 40% of Antarctica is 2500 meters or more above sea level.

The ice over most of the Southern Continent (at least 62%), which is more than 1500 meters in elevation probably would not have melted even if it had been shifted well out of the polar zone. Thus, in contrast to the accumulation and melting of ice in the northern polar zone and its effect on global sea levels, changes in the location of Antarctica would have been less of a factor.

The mountainous interior of Greenland has the most ice, which coincidentally has remained in the polar zone for the past 130,000 years. As shown below, areas with the thickest ice in Antarctica are not always the highest in elevation as they are in Greenland.

The Bottom Line

We have shown that changes in the geographic location of the polar zone, which Hapgood believed was responsible for ice ages in different parts of the world at different times, can explain the extent of the northern ice sheet at the time of the LGM, why the thickest ice at both the North and South Poles is where it is, and how, as discussed in the previous article, portions of Antarctica could have been ice-free during the North American ice age. Future articles will examine other implications of Hapgood’s revolutionary theory.

Hapgood’s analysis of maps in use during the Middle Ages known as portolans revealed their accuracy was better than what was possible given the nautical knowledge of the time. An analysis of one of those maps – the Orontius Fineaus map of 1531 supports the hypothesis that the original sources on which it was based could predate the current historical period to a time when the geographic poles were in a different location and Western Antarctica was ice-free.

Click here to read full paper.

Charles Hapgood

In Maps of the Ancient Sea Kings, Charles Hapgood, with the help of his students at Keene State College discovered that certain ancient maps could be thousands of years old or more based on both the detail and accuracy of the information they contain. Perhaps the most famous, the Piri Reis (PR) map of 1513 appears to depict a part of the Antarctic coastline, a fact at odds with the general belief that the southern continent was not discovered until the 19^th century. Remarkably, another map, the Orontius Fineaus (OF) map, which was drawn in 1531 shows the whole of Antarctica with details suggesting much of it was once ice-free.

An Ice-Free Antarctica?

Although there is no scientific evidence supporting a continent entirely free of ice, Scherer et al. show that some glacial sediment samples recovered from beneath the West Antarctic ice sheet indicate the Ross Embayment could have once been an open marine environment during the Pleistocene as early as Marine Isotope Stage (MIS) 11 or 5e, or 100–400 Kya. The configuration of West Antarctic seaways after a hypothetical collapse of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet is not inconsistent with Hapgood’s hypothesis of a previous pole in Hudson Bay having the corresponding South Pole off the eastern coast of Antarctica in the South Indian Ocean. With the pole at this location, West Antarctica would have been outside of the south polar region providing an alternative mechanism to explain the collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet.

Analysis of Hapgood’s Analysis

In a detailed analysis of the OF map, Hapgood found approximately fifty geographical features that he could identify on a modern map. Plotting the difference (error) between the OF and true map coordinates reveals a random distribution of errors with no apparent trend (correlation) with respect to either latitude or longitude.

Most maps at the time the OF and PR are thought to have been drawn were portolans (port-to-port navigational maps) rendered in planar projections. It has been suggested that certain maps such as the OF were redrawn from earlier maps that had been based on a spherical model of the Earth. In exploring this idea we can estimate what the OF map coordinates would have been had they based on a knowledge of spherical geometry with any remaining differences due to errors in the original source(s). Plotting differences between true and estimated OF map coordinates reveals a subtle, but statistically significant trend.

Evidence of an Earlier Pole?

Other than there being fewer identified features in the interior of Antarctica, i.e., near the South Pole, there is no statistical evidence that there was any less ice in the interior than along the coastline. The positive correlation in the scatter plot indicates an increase in map errors in positive (eastern) longitudes. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the OF map was compiled when Western Antarctica had less ice (more land area was exposed) than Eastern Antarctica. But why would land west of the South Pole be ice-free while land east of the Pole was not?

One possibility is that Western Antarctica was ice-free because the South Pole was located about 2,000 miles east of its present location. If this were so one would expect errors to be correlated with distance to the old pole. In fact, the largest errors vs. longitude relative to the current pole point in the direction of a hypothesized pole in the South Indian Sea.

What Could This Mean?

Hapgood’s analysis of portolan maps in use during the Middle Ages revealed their accuracy was better than what was possible given the nautical knowledge of the time. He even goes as far as stating “we have evidence here that all the portolans stemmed from a common origin in ancient times.” In our analysis of Hapgood’s analysis of the Orontius Finaeus map, we find OF and true map longitudes are more correlated than OF and true map latitudes, which is hard to explain in light of the fact that accurate longitudes requires accurate clocks, which did not exist at that time.

Our findings support the idea that if the original OF map were based on a spherical model of the Earth, errors would likely increase in Eastern Antarctica if the landscape was covered in ice by virtue of it being closer to the former pole than in Western Antarctica, which would have been well outside of the polar zone and so have been ice-free. It is possible that lands to the east covered with ice were likely less accessible and so not as well mapped as those to the west.

Putting it all together, we propose that the sources of the OF and other similar maps of the time were not only pre-Greek as Hapgood believed but predate the current historical period, specifically to a previous world age in which the North Pole was in Hudson Bay and the corresponding South Pole was in the South Indian Ocean, approximately 2,000 miles east of its current location.

Breathing new life into Charles Hapgood’s theory of earth crustal displacement/pole shifts, a new paper proposes that short-term reversals of the geomagnetic field may “unlock” the crust sufficiently to allow tidal forces to pull it over the mantle in the same way they move earth’s oceans. With existing climate theories unable to provide a satisfactory explanation of glacial cycles and ice ages, a revised version of Hapgood’s theory has been developed that explains sea-level changes resulting from the buildup and melting of polar ice over ice age/glacial cycles by a combination of Milanković cycles and Hapgood pole shifts.

Click here to read the paper.

Watch a video presentation sponsored by the Society for Scientific Exploration.

Introduction

In this article, we begin by revisiting Hapgood’s theory of earth crustal displacement in the context of recent developments in climate and geoscience and show that it may be the missing link in understanding not only the rise and fall of past civilizations, as we first set out to do in Before Atlantis, but ice age/glacial cycles as well. A modified version of Hapgood’s theory is then described based on a new mechanism that is triggered by short-term reversals of the geomagnetic field that “unlock” the crust from the mantle and driven by earth-moon-sun tidal forces, the same forces that move earth’s oceans. 

Milanković Cycles

In the 1920s, Milutin Milanković proposed that changes in earth’s eccentricity, axial tilt (obliquity), and precession result in cyclical variations in the amount of incident solar radiation (insolation) reaching the earth. Insolation is generally assumed to be a major driver of climate change over long periods. From 1–3 million years ago, climate patterns were correlated with the earth’s 41 Ky-long obliquity cycle. Then, about a million years ago, patterns began to follow a 100 Ky cycle that is between the 95 Ky and 125 Ky cycles in earth’s orbital eccentricity. Why the period of climate patterns changed, the origin of the 100 Ky cycle, and why insolation lags rather than leads climate changes are among some of the problems that cannot be explained by Milanković cycles. Perhaps the greatest shortfall of Milanković’s theory is the inability of insolation in itself to accurately account for the periodic buildup and melting of polar ice over glacial cycles.

The two time series, insolation and global sea level, shown above are weakly correlated (R=0.14). There is a somewhat higher (R=0.33) correlation between insolation and temperature, and an even greater correlation (R=0.63) between insolation and changes in sea level as a function of time. The reason for the increased correlation is that as insolation increases, temperatures increase, polar ice melts, and sea levels rise. Conversely, as insolation decreases, temperatures decrease, precipitation freezes and accumulates at the poles, and sea levels fall. Exploiting this correlation, we can estimate mean sea level change ∆s(t) as a function of insolation Q(t) that when summed provide an estimate of sea level s(t) as a function of insolation over time.

What Insolation Does Not Predict

Over the last two glacial cycles, insolation tends to underpredict sea level (over predict polar ice) at the beginning of a cycle and over predict sea level (under predict polar ice) at the end. In other words, a greater amount of ice melts at the beginning and accumulates at the end of a glacial cycle than what is predicted by insolation. 

Pole Shifts and Sea Level Changes

Insolation increases as we move toward the equator. Allowing the geographic location of the earth’s poles to shift relative to the rotational axis as Hapgood proposed provides a means that can potentially account for the difference between the above sea-level curves. Before the start of a glacial cycle, a large amount of water is stored in an ice sheet around the pole. If the crust displaces enough to move the ice sheet out of the polar zone, the increased amount of solar radiation at lower latitudes will cause the ice to melt raising sea levels. After a period, an ice sheet begins to form at the new pole causing sea levels once again to fall.

Sea levels decrease in stages during a glacial cycle suggesting a continued buildup of ice near the poles. Notice the land area around the pole is different at different pole locations. Since ice forms and accumulates more readily on land than over the ocean, if the land area at the new pole is greater than the land area at the old pole, sea levels after a pole shift should eventually fall to a lower level as there is a greater area for ice to accumulate. Based on measurements of land area in the Arctic circle and former polar regions there is a strong correlation between the size of the ice sheet (assumed to be determined by land area) and sea level for the current and four prior pole locations. Successive increases in available land area following the Bering Sea to Greenland pole shift have led to successive decreases in sea level. This suggests that the magnitude of crustal displacements during a glacial cycle, i.e., before the last glacial maximum (LGM) and penultimate glacial maximum (PGM) were small enough to keep the accumulating mass of ice in the polar zone. The precipitous rise in sea level after the LGM and PGM suggests that larger magnitude crustal displacements shifted the ice sheet farther south to melt a significant fraction of the accumulated ice. 

A Possible Mechanism for Crustal Displacements

In his original theory, Hapgood proposed polar ice creates mass imbalances that can cause the crust to slip over the mantle shifting the geographic location of the North Pole. Einstein later argued that the force of the ice was not sufficient to cause a crustal displacement. Using models of the crust and ice sheets at the LGM to estimate the degree to which the ice could have affected the earth’s moments of inertia, it has been determined that if the crust were free to move, the ice would have shifted the pole by less than 0.25° relative to its present position. 

If the first part of Hapgood’s theory is wrong, that ice cannot move the pole, is there another way to save the rest of his theory?

An analysis of alternative mass distribution models reveals the theoretical axis of rotation (TRA) of the crust deviates significantly from the earth’s rotational axis and so may not be in equilibrium with the earth. We have determined the crust’s TRA is at 1.21°N, 18.52° W. This location lies in the zone of the tropics almost on the equator. At the equinox, the equator is parallel with the ecliptic plane. At other times of the year, the ecliptic passes through the earth’s equatorial region between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn. The path of the sun, moon and most other bodies in the solar system lies along the ecliptic. That the crust’s TRA points in this direction suggest the possibility the crustal disequilibrium may have an external (i.e., extraterrestrial) cause.

The influence of the moon, and to a lesser extent, the sun, are responsible for the earth’s tides. The balance between gravitational and centrifugal forces causes the earth (primarily its oceans) to elongate in the direction of the moon by 1.34 meters and the direction of the sun by 0.61 meters. As the earth rotates, tidal forces cause the oceans to rise and fall twice a day. These forces also pull on the crust. It has been proposed that tidal forces acting on the crust could be a possible trigger for certain kinds of earthquakes. 

Tidal torques acting on the earth and moon dissipate energy. With the crust “locked” to the mantle, the energy loss manifests as the frictional heating of the crust and oceans. If, however, the crust became “unlocked” the effective work could result in a displacement of the crust over the mantle. The key to crustal displacement thus becomes the question of whether there is a way for the crust to become unlocked from the mantle. 

A growing body of evidence suggests changes in the earth’s magnetic field may influence climate. Over the last 83 million years, 183 geomagnetic reversals have taken place in which the poles changed polarity. Geomagnetic reversals occur, on average, 450 Ky years apart. Long periods (millions of years) in which the magnetic poles do not flip preceded the four largest extinctions on earth: the Cretaceous-Tertiary (KT), Triassic-Jurassic (TJ), and the Permo-Triassic (PT) and Guadalupian-Tatarian (GT) doublet. Between geomagnetic reversals, events known as geomagnetic excursions take place where the field temporarily reverses for a shorter period (thousands of years or less).

One possibility is that changes in the magnetic field during a geomagnetic excursion may affect the ease with which the crust can move over the mantle. Magnetic dipoles of ferromagnetic minerals in the crust normally line up in the same direction as those in the core resulting in continental ferromagnetic fields. It is conjectured that when the core magnetic field flips during a geomagnetic excursion, the dipoles in the crust temporarily point in the opposite direction to produce a repulsive force between the crust and core fields. If this force, perpendicular to the crust, is sufficient to reduce the frictional force between the crust and mantle, it may be possible for forces acting on the crust parallel to the surface to move the crust over the mantle while the geomagnetic field is reversed. When the geomagnetic field flips back the crust is once again locked to the mantle maintaining disequilibrium.

Correlated Events

Although there is no way to test our conjecture directly, correlations between geomagnetic excursions, super-volcanic eruptions, and glacial events could imply causation. The Blake geomagnetic excursion occurred 15–20 Ky after the PGM. The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) is a relative measure of the explosiveness of volcanic eruptions.  The next two geomagnetic excursions were each followed by massive VEI 8 magnitude volcanic eruptions. The most recent Toba eruption 73–75 Kya followed the Norwegian-Greenland Sea excursion. The Oruanui eruption of New Zealand’s Taupo volcano followed the Lake Mungo excursion 28–30 Kya. The somewhat smaller VEI 7 Phlegraean Fields eruption followed the Laschamp event 40–42 Kya.

Although the trigger mechanism for geomagnetic reversals is not clear, crustal shifts could provide an explanation for earthquake activity, volcanic eruptions, and other events that follow geomagnetic excursions. The Blake, Norwegian-Greenland Sea and Lachamps geomagnetic excursions precede three episodes of sea level decline/increase of polar ice. The Lake Mungo geomagnetic excursion occurs just before the LGM after which global sea levels began to rise to current levels. According to the model, crustal displacement(s) triggered by the Mungo Lake and possibly the Gothenburg geomagnetic excursions shifted most of the ice sheet that had formed up to the LGM almost 2,000 miles south well into the temperate zone leading to rapid melting and sea-level rise. The Younger Dryas event was also likely a significant contributor to glacial melt. All four events appear to be somewhat correlated with Milanković cycles evident in the insolation curve. Three precede major volcanic eruptions. 

Conclusion

We show how Hapgood pole shifts working in conjunction with Milanković cycles provide a possible explanation for climate changes over past glacial cycles. That the crust does not appear to be in equilibrium with the whole earth in terms of their moments of inertia suggests the possibility that an unknown force could be at work. We propose earth-moon-sun tidal forces may be responsible, and that these forces, which move the earth’s oceans might provide sufficient energy to displace the crust a significant distance during a geomagnetic excursion. It is our hope that these new findings will lead to further work in these and other related areas of research.

The featured image at the top of the article was captured by the astronauts about the International Space Station.